<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only network if you have a reason</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.15inno.com/2009/06/15/network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.15inno.com/2009/06/15/network/</link>
	<description>Open innovation, social media tools and intrapreneurship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:07:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Richards</title>
		<link>http://www.15inno.com/2009/06/15/network/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.15inno.com/?p=180#comment-262</guid>
		<description>If ever there was a headline that drew me in, it was this one. 
 
I agree about being selective about your network. We all have only so much time and energy. I prefer to have deeper relationships with fewer people. In my business (ghostwriting) I may spend months with a client. The relationship is fertile ground for the emergence of the work. 
 
In American culture we don&#039;t pay enough attention to the quality of connection we have with other people, those with whom we do business. 
 
I remember reading Kimono Mind a book about Japan and the Japanese. They spend a lot more time considering action (and relationship) before plunging ahead with action. There is probably a ratio of thought and action that is inverse in this country. We value what we can see. We see action but we can&#039;t see thought. 
 
The idea about large LinkedIn networks is broadcast TV mentality. If you&#039;re selling a product then a bigger (appropriate) audience the better. 
 
But for individuals selling services, it&#039;s a different kettle of fish. And just to really mix metaphors, we can have a small tribe. 
 
I enjoyed reading your post: good advice. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If ever there was a headline that drew me in, it was this one. </p>
<p>I agree about being selective about your network. We all have only so much time and energy. I prefer to have deeper relationships with fewer people. In my business (ghostwriting) I may spend months with a client. The relationship is fertile ground for the emergence of the work. </p>
<p>In American culture we don&#039;t pay enough attention to the quality of connection we have with other people, those with whom we do business. </p>
<p>I remember reading Kimono Mind a book about Japan and the Japanese. They spend a lot more time considering action (and relationship) before plunging ahead with action. There is probably a ratio of thought and action that is inverse in this country. We value what we can see. We see action but we can&#039;t see thought. </p>
<p>The idea about large LinkedIn networks is broadcast TV mentality. If you&#039;re selling a product then a bigger (appropriate) audience the better. </p>
<p>But for individuals selling services, it&#039;s a different kettle of fish. And just to really mix metaphors, we can have a small tribe. </p>
<p>I enjoyed reading your post: good advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

