<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Input Needed for Open Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.15inno.com/2009/08/10/the-input-needed-for-open-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.15inno.com/2009/08/10/the-input-needed-for-open-innovation/</link>
	<description>Open innovation, social media tools and intrapreneurship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:07:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariyana Tchivikova</title>
		<link>http://www.15inno.com/2009/08/10/the-input-needed-for-open-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariyana Tchivikova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.15inno.com/?p=681#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Dear Stefan, 
 
I think you categorize the input quite elaborately and in detail. However, it is more convenient for me (and closer to my understanding) to split the input between the main three parties, included in the innovation process: individual, business and institutional parts. Then we can form both common and specific sub-categories for each party such as: e.g. tangible and intangible resources. Having your categorization, all of the above mentioned things get covered, but the borders between external/internal/corporate/personal are not quite clear... 
 
I also think that it would be even more challenging to try to categorize the possible outcomes.. maybe based on several casestudies and develop best/worst scenarios... 
 
Mariyana </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Stefan, </p>
<p>I think you categorize the input quite elaborately and in detail. However, it is more convenient for me (and closer to my understanding) to split the input between the main three parties, included in the innovation process: individual, business and institutional parts. Then we can form both common and specific sub-categories for each party such as: e.g. tangible and intangible resources. Having your categorization, all of the above mentioned things get covered, but the borders between external/internal/corporate/personal are not quite clear&#8230; </p>
<p>I also think that it would be even more challenging to try to categorize the possible outcomes.. maybe based on several casestudies and develop best/worst scenarios&#8230; </p>
<p>Mariyana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

