<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Radical Innovation Happen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.15inno.com/2010/02/10/radicalinno/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.15inno.com/2010/02/10/radicalinno/</link>
	<description>Open innovation, social media tools and intrapreneurship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:07:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Sokol</title>
		<link>http://www.15inno.com/2010/02/10/radicalinno/comment-page-1/#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Sokol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.15inno.com/?p=1347#comment-983</guid>
		<description>Excellent post and I&#039;d like to challenge you (and any others reading comments) to think about how you would modify the approach if the organization is not willing to assign employees to the innovation opportunities as this one does.  I see many companies interested in innovation, but their labor model and state of readiness for innovation will not allow them to remove employees for even 25% of the week to work on an innovation team.  More likely, they are expected to maintain full accountability for their day jobs.    
 
Sure, we can walk away from such companies and say they are not sufficiently committed.  The other approach might be to help them take a first step with such a restricted labor model.  
 
What might you advise? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post and I&#039;d like to challenge you (and any others reading comments) to think about how you would modify the approach if the organization is not willing to assign employees to the innovation opportunities as this one does.  I see many companies interested in innovation, but their labor model and state of readiness for innovation will not allow them to remove employees for even 25% of the week to work on an innovation team.  More likely, they are expected to maintain full accountability for their day jobs.   </p>
<p>Sure, we can walk away from such companies and say they are not sufficiently committed.  The other approach might be to help them take a first step with such a restricted labor model. </p>
<p>What might you advise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

