Board of Directors = Enemy of Innovation?
I recently provided five reasons why executives do a poor job on innovation and although this makes it difficult for innovation leaders to do their job, I am glad to say that things are changing for the better.
A new generation of executives that knows the importance of innovation has begun to emerge and this will provide a more healthy balance of innovation versus cost cutting in many companies.
The bad news is that we are still stuck with “old-school” boards of directors that seem to be quite far away from the new way of thinking innovation. This is actually an even bigger problem as board of directors indirectly holds more power than the CEO when it comes to innovation. You can read some of my views on this here: Efficiency versus Innovation: Who Wins?
An obvious solution to this problem is to bring more diversity to boards of directors, but this is not done easily as Jean-Francois Manzoni, Paul Strebel and Jean-Louis Barsoux explains in this great article: Why Diversity Can Backfire on Company Boards.
This includes this piece:
“As much as diversity is something we prize, the truth is that people often feel baffled, threatened or even annoyed by persons with views and backgrounds very different from their own. The result is that when directors are appointed because their views or backgrounds are different, they often are isolated and ignored. Constructive disagreements spill over into personal battles.
But the solution is not to give up and avoid diversity. Rather, boards need to minimize the friction that diversity often introduces. To unlock the benefits, in short, boards must learn to work with colleagues who were selected not because they fit in—but because they don’t.”
In the article, the authors not only do a great job of identifying the reasons why diversity often fails. They also chip in with good advice on how to approach this.
Unfortunately, I think we are still in the early stages of their advised approach and thus we are going to be stuck with inept board of directions when it comes to developing the innovation capabilities of a company for a long time.
Although, I don’t really see any short-term solutions, I think we will see a faster change of mindset and approaches on this as many companies are will go down in the near future (when the economy gets back on track) because of their lack of innovation.
This is not really a positive way to end this blog post, but perhaps you can help with some different perspectives.




You say that you do not end positive but in my opinion you do! I consider it a benefit to the world that people will leave companies that do not innovate, do not treat them well and are all about efficiency and bucks. I feel good when reading your ending, there is hope that things are indeed at a tipping point and that change will change as fast as change itself
The future is to creativity and people!
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and motivating people like myself that there is hope.
Grtz
Appreciate your thoughts and kind words!
Good thoughts on diversity.
History has shown the value of diversity but few of us embrace it. People that think like us are easy to understand – people that don't think like us are considered difficult and we would prefer if they would just go away.
The great innovators and contributors to mankind rarely fit in.
Most companies are run by bankers – no risk and small gains. Perhaps we need to ask ourselves where we are on the scale between innovator and banker.
If we could train ourselves to be more tolerant we could achieve great things. Unfortunately, the desires of the ego seems to be a stronger force than the success of the company.
Human behavior is often the biggest obstacle for progress
Innovation is quite rare if you consider that while many people may have 'ideas', only relatively few of those ideas actually develop into a specific product.
Are we innovative for having ideas? Or as 'thinkers', do we simply have the potential to become 'innovative'.
Are actual innovators therefore, those 'thinkers' who have the personality traits that go beyond mere 'thinking', and drive their ideas to fruition.
Hi Ralph, I can see where you are going, but I think it is important to point out two differences, which in particular are relevant for large companies (my focus areas). Innovation is not just about having ideas (you also need a process to make them happen) and innovators do not make things happen by themselves anymore (they happen in teams with internal colleagues and external partners). I don't think we disagree much, but I just wanted to mention this.